The Princes In The Tower

The Mystery Surrounding Edward IV's Sons

3 Comments
Join the Conversation
The victims-King Edward V and the Duke of York - Paul Delaroche
The victims-King Edward V and the Duke of York - Paul Delaroche
Edward V and his brother Richard, Duke of York, are best-known in history as "the Princes in the Tower" since the 15th Century. Their deaths still remain a great mystery.

Twelve-year-old Edward V was proclaimed King on 11 April 1483, two days after his father’s death. Edward IV died unexpectedly after he caught a chill from a fishing trip. Edward IV’s trusted brother, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, was named as Lord Protector.

Edward was intelligent, a good learner and possessed the abilities of a successful king had he lived. His mother was a major influence during the 1470s until he left for Wales.

Edward lived at Ludlow Castle, as Prince of Wales, under his uncle’s guardianship.

King of England

His mother, Elizabeth Wydville, sent a message to her brother, Earl Rivers, to bring Edward V to London immediately. Other Wydville relatives seized the treasury, secured the Tower of London and prepared defences in case of a military assault. Elizabeth planned to exclude her brother-in-law Richard from the new regime.

Preparations began for Edward’s coronation in May.

Lord Hastings sent a message to the Duke of Gloucester informing him of his brother’s death and the Wydvilles’ actions.

Richard loathed the Wydvilles because they shamelessly used their connections with the Queen to acquiring wealth and titles.

He travelled south after he swore loyalty to the new king.

However, Richard intercepts Edward en-route to London.

The Queen sought refuge in Sanctuary at Westminster Abbey with her children once Richard took charge. Earl Rivers was later arrested and sent to the Tower.

New kings went to the Tower of London prior to their coronation, including Edward V. Richard, Duke of York, soon joined his brother.

Deposed

Richard then revived an old rumour Edward IV was secretly contracted to marry Eleanor Butler, and his marriage to Elizabeth Woodville was null and void. All parties involved were now dead and unable to protest.

On 22 June, Parliament decreed Edward’s marriage to Elizabeth Wydville invalid and their children were illegitimate.

Edward was deposed on 25 June 1483. Richard of Gloucester was proclaimed king.

Vanished

The two princes’ servants were dismissed in June. They were last seen playing in the Tower’s gardens until July1483. They were never seen again.

Thomas More and Shakespeare circulated propaganda which destroyed Richard III’s reputation. Edward and his brother were allegedly smothered in their sleep by Sir James Tyrrell. (He later confessed under torture in 1502.)

Elizabeth Wydville believed they were already dead when she plotted to marry her eldest daughter to Margaret Beaufort’s son.

No one searched for their bodies at the time. No funeral was held.

The plot thickens …

Workmen found two bodies—assumed to be the princes—in 1674. They were reburied in Westminster Abbey on Charles II’s orders.

George V granted permission for the bones to be re-examined using improved medical technology. Dr Lawrence E Tanner (an eminent physician, archivist and Keeper of the Monuments in Westminster Abbey) and Professor William Wright (a dental surgeon) examined the bones in 1933. They were unable to identify the sex and age of the bones but they estimated they belonged to children aged twelve to thirteen and nine to eleven years.

Yet there were too many coincidences between the missing princes and the bones. The experts believed the princes were murdered in 1483.

The Richard III Society unsuccessfully applied several times to obtain royal permission to exhume the bodies for further tests to prove his innocence.

Scientific advances since 1933 could now establish the sex and ages of the bodies. Or compare DNA from Edward IV’s body at Windsor. [1]

No experts could determine the cause of death or their murderer’s identity. Richard III remains the chief suspect although it can never be proved.

The Duke of Buckingham and Henry VII, no doubt, also wanted the princes dead because they were a threat.

Sources

Cunningham, Sean, Richard III: A royal enigma, The National Archives, Richmond, 2003

Erickson, Carolly, Royal Panoply, St Martin's Press, New York, 2003

Hilliam, David, Kings, Queens, Bones and Bastards, Sutton Publishing, Stroud, 1998

Lewis, Brenda Ralph, Kings & Queens of England: Murder, Mayhem, and Scandal--1066 to the Present Day, Reader's Digest, Pleasantville NY, 2003

Ormrod, W M, The Kings & Queens of England, Tempus, Stroud, 2001 (Reprinted 2004)

Starkey, David, Monarchy: From the Middle Ages To Modernity, HarperCollins Publishers, London, 2006

Weir, Alison, The Princes in the Tower, Pimlico (an imprint of Random House), London, 1992

[1] Cunningham, Sean, Richard III: A royal enigma, The National Archives, Richmond, 2003, pp 44-45

Carolyn Cash, Carolyn Cash

Carolyn M Cash - Carolyn M Cash is a freelance writer residing in the Sutherland Shire (aka God's Own Country), Sydney, Australia, whilst studying ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 9+10?

Comments

Oct 11, 2010 8:38 AM
Guest :
I think it was a very good article and has alot of good detail. It really helped me understand the mystery of The 2 Princes in the Tower, and I think more people should read it!
Dec 5, 2010 5:56 PM
Guest :
Far too many "authors" assert Tyrell's statement was taken under torture. More's account of the confession only mentions examination but not torture. While torture was often part of medieval examination, this assumption can not be stated as fact unless there is a source that states actual torture. What is the source you're using for this?
Dec 6, 2010 12:07 AM
Carolyn M Cash :
Guest (5 Dec 2010) There are a list of sources at the bottom of the article. Suggest you read these and find out for yourself!
3 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement